JavaScript is required
Victoria is currently experiencing significant bushfire risk. Please stay informed at emergency.vic.gov.au
emergency.vic.gov.au

About the response

The WP Survey targeted specialists working for the following types of employers:

  • Specialist family violence (victim survivor) services (SFVS) organisations
  • Sexual assault support services (SASS) organisations
  • Family violence perpetrator intervention (FVPI) organisations[9]
  • Aboriginal Community Controlled Organisations (ACCO)
  • The Orange Door Network (TODN), including child wellbeing specialists.[10]

The final survey sample was 1,049 responses, representing a response rate of approximately 35% of the target population.

Response by organisation type

The largest number and proportion of those who responded to the survey were from SFVS organisations, with 41% (426 persons) stating they worked for a SFVS organisation providing victim survivor services (Table 1).

In comparison, 28% of those who responded (289 persons) were employed by TOD Network, 15% (162 persons) were employed by a SASS organisation, 10% (110 persons) were employed by a FVPI provider and 6% (62 persons) were employed by an ACCO.

Table 1: Where do you work?
Count Percentage
TODN 289 28%
SFVS 426 41%
SASS 162 15%
FVPI 110 10%
ACCO 62 6%
Grand total 1,049

Source. Question 1, WP Survey 2022

The survey’s eligibility rules included child wellbeing specialists working in TOD network. From those working in TOD network:

  • 18 respondents identified their role as dedicated to supporting families needing support with the care and wellbeing of children and young people,
  • 88 respondents identified their role as dedicated to working with victim survivors and/or people using family violence, and
  • 183 respondents stated they supported both (Table 2).
Table 2: What client groups do you primarily provide services to directly or indirectly (as part of TOD network workforce)?
Count Percentage
Victim survivors and/or people using family violence 88 30%
Families needing support with the care and wellbeing of children and young people 18 6%
Both of the above 183 63%
Grand total 289
Missing/skipped question 0

Source. Question 1A, WP Survey 2022

Response by geographic location

61% of those who responded (638 persons) stated they work in metropolitan Melbourne, with the remainder (400 persons) working in regional Victoria (Table 3).

Focusing on those who responded from regional Victoria:

  • 10% (104 persons) worked in the Loddon Mallee region,
  • 9% (95 persons) worked in the Gippsland region,
  • 7% (73 persons) worked in the Hume region,
  • 7% (71 persons) worked in the Barwon South-West Region and
  • 5% (57 persons) worked in the Grampians region.[11]
Table 3: In your main role, what region and Local Government Area do you work in?
Count Percentage
Metropolitan Melbourne 638 61%
Loddon Mallee region 104 10%
Gippsland region 95 9%
Hume region 73 7%
Barwon South-West region 71 7%
Grampians region 57 5%
Don’t know/unsure 7 <1%
Grand total 1045
Missing/skipped question 4

Source. Question 3, WP Survey 2022

A much larger proportion of people working in metropolitan Melbourne worked in large organisations (organisations with more than 100 staff). 52% of people who delivered services into metropolitan areas worked for large organisations, compared to 36% of people delivering services into regional Victoria.

Response by type of service provision

Fifty-five percent of those who responded (573 persons) stated their role provides services across multiple locations, with only 29% (300 persons) stating that their role provides services only in the location they work (Table 4). 8% (84 persons) stated their role provides state-wide services, with 3% (35 persons) stating their role provides Melbourne-wide services, 3% (27 persons) stating their role provides regional Victoria wide services and 2% (22 persons) stating their role provides national services.

Table 4: In your main role, which location/s do you provide services to?
Count Percentage
My role provides services across multiple locations 573 55%
My role provides services in the location I work in (i.e. the location of the office where I work) 300 29%
My role provides state-wide services 84 8%
My role provides metropolitan Melbourne-wide services 35 3%
My role provides regional Victoria-wide services 27 3%
My role provides national services 22 2%
Don’t know/unsure (Please list postcode(s)) 6 <1%
Grand total 1,047
Missing/skipped question 2

Source. Question 4, WP Survey 2022

People working for organisations delivering services in the regions were more likely to provide services across multiple locations. 59% of people in regional Victoria stated their role provides services across multiple locations compared to 53% in metropolitan Melbourne. People who were securely employed were also more likely to deliver services for organisations across multiple locations. 56% of those employed on an ongoing basis delivered services for organisations across multiple locations, compared to 47% of those employed on an insecure basis.

Response by organisation size

48% of those who responded (501 persons) stated they worked in an organisation where 200 or more individuals were employed, followed by 19% (202 persons) who stated they worked in an organisation with 20-49 individuals, and 13% (133 persons) who stated they worked in an organisation with 100-199 individuals (Table 5).

Table 5: How many individuals are employed in the organisation you work for (for this role)?
Count Percentage
1 to 4 13 1%
5 to 19 96 9%
20 to 49 202 19%
50 to 99 96 9%
100 to 199 133 13%
200 or more 501 48%
I am self-employed <5 <1%
Other <5 <1%
Don’t know/unsure 6 <1%
Grand total 1,049
Missing/skipped question 0

Source. Question 2, WP Survey 2022

Notes

[9] Family violence perpetrator intervention organisation combines workers within specialist family violence services organisations (services for adults using violence) and Men's Behaviour Change Program providers.

[10] For a detailed definition of the specialist target population, please refer to the Appendix.

[11] The distribution across regional and metropolitan Victoria provides some assurance that the survey sample contains a diversity of workforce views on the basis of the geographical location of the delivery of services. See the Appendix for further detail.

Updated