JavaScript is required

Fire Services Implementation Monitor Annual Report 2023-24

Published by:
Fire Services Implementation Monitor
Date:
28 Nov 2024

This online version of the FSIM Annual report has been optimised for improved accessibility and usability.

Foreword

The Fire Services Implementation Monitor, the Hon. Niall Blair, introduces his Year Four Annual Report (2023/2024).

Message from the Fire Services Implementation Monitor, the Hon. Niall Blair

I am pleased to present to you my fourth annual report on the progress made by the Country Fire Authority, Fire Rescue Victoria, the Firefighters Registration Board and the Department of Justice and Community Safety in implementing the government’s Fire Services Reform Implementation Plan. This report brings together my observations and analysis on the efforts of Victoria’s fire services to implement the Government’s vision for a modern and interoperable fire service.

My assessment is based on the information provided to me by agencies and my observations in the governance meetings I attend. I’ve also had conversations with operational staff and volunteers who have contacted me to share some of the reform-related challenges they face. I am grateful to everyone who has taken the time to discuss their experiences of the reform as it influences their day-to-day professional lives.

Based on my observations, years one and two of the reform involved significant work by agencies to understand the structure of the reforms, commencing the transition to the new model and efforts to define complementary fire services. Unfortunately, the momentum for change slowed during years three and four, which should have been key periods of time when actions central to the reform were developed and implemented. I am concerned about the barriers behind the decline in pace and the lack of a clear plan or pathway for resolution.

While I have witnessed agencies working hard to progress actions in the implementation plan during and post the reporting period, I have also observed a concerning and frustratingly poor use of time and resources. Agency decision-making forums, where options to pursue actions are canvassed, have operated poorly or not at all and agencies have therefore failed to capitalise on opportunities to drive important interoperability initiatives and deliver public value.

I am cognisant that the complex industrial environment within which fire services are operating is a key impediment to delivering the reform. I believe the well-documented insights presented in the recent IBAC report on Operation Turton, where the damaging impacts of the United Firefighters Union on efforts to drive change in the former Metropolitan Fire Brigade (MFB) are explored, continue to dominate decision-making and day-to-day operations of FRV and its ability to work with other fire agencies. The ‘consult and agree’ clause in FRV’s enterprise agreement for operational staff, which previously applied to MFB staff, disables the ability of management to implement policies without reaching consensus with the Union. The evidence provided to IBAC by former MFB executives on this matter aligns with the information my office has received about the long delays and barriers caused by this clause. My office has also received evidence of industrial action impacting CFA activities, particularly in co-located stations. This influence is hindering the completion of key actions underpinning the implementation plan, impacting operations and damaging the culture of the agencies and morale on the ground.

The secondment arrangement between FRV and CFA is another key and obvious example of where the ‘consult and agree’ requirement is impeding agency interoperability and contributing to operational challenges such as the vacancy and relief issues experienced by CFA. It is very disappointing that after four years of work to progress the reforms, guidelines for the everyday working of secondees, like OHS reporting, dispute and grievance resolution and relief management are not completed. Indeed, after four years, the only clear development in relation to secondees is the unanimous view held by stakeholders that the secondment agreement, as originally envisioned, is unlikely to be fully realised in the current industrial environment.

I share this view and believe that the future success of the secondment arrangement is now out of the hands of FRV and CFA. They have done all that they can do, in good faith, to have it successfully implemented and now must wait for the UFU to decide if they will allow the remaining issues to be resolved. The industrial environment and legislative limitations will curtail any further attempts to implement the secondment model, and the effort to try and work around these impediments does not present a cost-effective return. Something must change.

Indeed, from the information that I have gathered and reported on, it is clear the implementation of the reform is at a crossroad. Agencies can continue to work within the parameters that have frustrated progress for the past four years or look for new ways to get things done. It is nonsensical to expect different and better outcomes from the same approaches to completing actions in the implementation plan that have been adopted so far. I believe that if Victorian fire agencies do not find new approaches to completing reform actions, there is a strong risk that the Year Two to Five Fire Services Reform Implementation Plan actions will not be completed by June 2025.

The reform and the drivers behind the much-needed changes are warranted and can be clearly identified in different parts of Victoria. I hope it is clear from this report that agencies must commit to founding all decision-making on joint matters on the principles of complementary fire services. Most importantly, I believe that merely completing actions will not necessarily directly translate to the desired outcomes for this reform. The end goal extends further than the implementation plan alone.

Ultimately, this is about moving towards a modern and interoperable fire service that is capable of responding to Victoria’s emerging climactic conditions and changing risk profile. The forecast for the coming fire season is very concerning and could expose the reform-related issues being experienced on the ground, which go beyond the implementation plan actions alone.

Indeed, during this reporting period, the ongoing CFA vacancy and relief issues, reports of the nearest and most appropriate appliance not being dispatched to emergencies, and a broad range of secondment challenges, dominated the reports to my office and my attention as an observer in interagency meetings. Interestingly, there is little scope for these issues to be reported against the reform implementation plan actions. I can only pursue reports on these issues by stepping outside of the Year 2-5 implementation plan actions to investigate matters from the lens of complementary fire services. I will report my findings on these matters in due course.

Creating true interoperability of services requires the commitment to address the known reform challenges in a way that prioritises community outcomes, which could in turn guide the appropriate and effective use of agencies’ resources. Completing actions in the implementation plan will lead to some benefits to the Victorian community, but the original and most crucial intent of complementary fire services will be lost if the focus continues to be on ticking off actions that do not go to the heart of the challenges that are reported to me regularly.

As we enter the fifth year of implementation, I trust the reflections and findings in this report will support agencies to find new solutions to address these systemic issues and barriers to achieve meaningful and long-lasting change.

Introduction

An overview of the Fire Services Reform and the role of the Fire Services Implementation Monitor.

Overview

The Fire Services Implementation Monitor’s (FSIM’s) Year Four annual report delivers on the FSIM’s functions under section 131(1) of the Fire Rescue Victoria Act 1958 (FRV Act).

The report provides an independent assessment of progress made by the Country Fire Authority (CFA), Department of Justice and Community Safety (DJCS), Fire Rescue Victoria (FRV) and the Firefighters Registration Board (FRB) in implementing the Year 2-5 Fire Services Reform Implementation Plan actions.

Fire Services Reform

The 2017 Fire Services Statement outlines the government’s vision for a modern, sustainable and interoperable fire service that will keep Victorians safe.

On 1 July 2020, the Victorian Government commenced implementing Victoria’s new fire services model by establishing FRV as a career firefighting organisation and by restoring CFA to a community-based, volunteer firefighting organisation.

The Fire Services Reform Implementation Plan provides a roadmap for how agencies will work individually and jointly to achieve the government’s ten-year vision for reform.

Fire Services Implementation Monitor

FSIM was established as an independent entity in July 2020 under section 122 of the FRV Act to provide assurance to government and the community on progress towards a modern fire service for a safer Victoria.

FSIM monitors and reports on agencies’ progress to deliver relevant actions in the Fire Services Reform Implementation Plan and assesses the effectiveness of agencies’ actions.

FSIM publishes its findings in annual reports that are tabled in Parliament every year.

Methodology

This chapter elaborates on the scope of the Fire Services Implementation Monitor’s Year 4 monitoring activities and the approach to assessing progress.

Scope of FSIM’s Year Four monitoring activities

FSIM reports on actions taken by CFA, FRV, DJCS and the FRB from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024 to deliver against the revised actions and deliverables of the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan. The Year 2-5 Implementation Plan was revised as part of a DJCS-led review, which received in-principle support in early 2024 and formal Ministerial approval in July 2024.

The DJCS review of the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan (May 2023 update) followed FSIM’s recommendation in its Year 3 annual report that the plan be reviewed to reflect achievable timeframes and leverage learnings from the last three years of reform activity.

The review was conducted in consultation with CFA, FRV and the FRB, with agencies proposing varying degrees of changes to the actions. Notable changes include revisions to:

  • completion dates to be pragmatic and achievable
  • action descriptors and / or action objectives to better align with reform objectives
  • the lead agency for actions that require greater cross-agency collaboration (e.g. actions 3.8 and 5.1)
  • action deliverables to better align with the intent of the revised action descriptor and objectives.

The Minister for Emergency Services approved this change request in July 2024. The July 2024 update of the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan provides the basis for FSIM’s monitoring and assessment activities in this Year 4 report. Table 1 outlines the changes made to the actions in the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan as part of this change request.

FSIM notes that the updated Year 2-5 Implementation Plan provides a revised pathway for agencies to deliver joint actions (e.g. actions 3.8, 3.9 and 5.1). The review also resulted in several actions moving to business-as-usual and therefore outside FSIM’s scope to monitor for the purpose of this year’s report. FSIM will undertake effectiveness assessments of some of these completed actions in Year 5 to examine implementation progress and early outcomes.

Further, in Year 4, FSIM paused its function to monitor the fire services reform’s impact on the financial sustainability of FRV and CFA in line with section 131(1)(a)(iii) of the FRV Act. This was following advice received from the Minister in March 2024 that DJCS has portfolio responsibility for working with CFA and FRV in respect to both agencies’ financial sustainability and that the ongoing responsibility for this work falls outside the scope for this reform.

FSIM’s Year 4 annual report therefore provides an update on actions 5.7 and 5.8 in the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan to formally close off reporting on financial sustainability. Financial sustainability will not be a focus in future reporting by FSIM.

FSIM’s approach to monitoring and assessing progress

FSIM’s assessment of agencies’ progress in delivering relevant actions was informed by:

  • meetings with key stakeholders in CFA, FRV, DJCS, the Volunteer Fire Brigades Victoria (VFBV), Victoria’s Emergency Management Commissioner and the United Firefighters’ Union (UFU)
  • observations made in governance meetings, including at weekly CFA and FRV Heads of Agency (HoA) meetings and monthly Fire Services Reform Strategic Executive Committee (FSR SEC) meetings
  • a thorough and critical review of information and evidence provided by agencies demonstrating progress towards delivering a relevant action.

FSIM has triangulated evidence from these sources to develop a comprehensive understanding of agencies’ progress against relevant actions and to ensure FSIM’s assessment of progress is based on accurate and reliable information. FSIM also engaged with agencies to provide explanations for delays in relevant actions and mitigation strategies in place to address these delays.

Findings and recommendations

Key findings, potential barriers impacting reform implementation and recommendations.

Finding one: Agencies have implemented all the recommendations made in FSIM’s previous annual reports and are starting to realise the benefits at a strategic level

In response to FSIM’s recommendation in the 2022/23 annual report, DJCS completed a review of all the remaining actions in the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan. This review was completed in consultation with CFA, FRV and the FRB and the revised actions were approved as a change request by the Minister in July 2024. The scope of the review was narrower than FSIM had envisaged in its recommendation, with several actions moving to business-as-usual. FSIM will continue to monitor the implementation of these completed actions through effectiveness assessments in future to examine impact (i.e. intended and unintended outcomes) and better understand implementation challenges.

FSIM is satisfied that agencies have a shared understanding of the definition and principles of complementary fire services and looks forward to its application in decision-making. This was a recommendation in FSIM’s 2021/22 annual report but this was completed in 2023/24.

FSIM is also satisfied that DJCS has established relevant governance arrangements to address financial sustainability for agencies in the emergency management sector, including CFA and FRV. This was in response to a recommendation in FSIM’s 2021/22 annual report.

Lastly, in response to FSIM’s recommendations in its 2022/23 annual report, CFA and the Community Safety Building Authority (CSBA) jointly established operational procedures to evaluate station replacement and upgrade projects managed by CSBA as part of action 3.2. CFA also developed a fire services reform dashboard tracking tool to be used as a shared resource by CFA and FRV to monitor the progress of the agreements and guidelines being developed under action 3.9 against the consultation workflow process.

Finding two: Long-standing systemic issues are a significant barrier to progressing actions jointly led by CFA and FRV c

The long-standing systemic issues outlined below have been extensively commented on by FSIM in all previous annual reports. These systemic issues continued to impact on the completion of relevant implementation plan actions in 2023/24.

FSIM continues to observe that while agencies have made progress delivering actions they are leading individually, systemic issues relating to FRV’s consultation requirements and the current framework for community infrastructure service delivery continue to present barriers to delivering joint actions that underpin the reform.

FRV is required to consult with the UFU and reach consensus via the Operational Consultative Committee process before implementing any matter or change relating to FRV employees. As FSIM has noted in previous annual reports, and has continued to observe in 2023/24, this requirement presents a significant barrier to progressing important reform-related matters, with the Operational Consultative Committee’s outcome falling outside the control or ability of any one agency to influence. This has often resulted in significant delays to completing an action or important matters being put on hold with no clear pathway for resolution. It has also stymied proposed workarounds by agencies to address entrenched problems, resulting in significant operational implications for career and volunteer firefighters. In addition, due to the industrial bans in this reporting period, the Corporate and Technical Employees Consultative Committee only met twice and, on neither occasion considered matters pertaining to the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan actions (e.g. the Information Sharing MoU under action 3.12). As a result, there is a backlog of items for the Committee to work through, which could further delay progress on Year 2-5 Implementation Plan actions that require consultation.

Further, the barriers for delivering end-to-end services in the Country Area of Victoria (CAoV) continue to exist in the absence of necessary amendments to the Victorian Planning Provisions. While agencies have developed workarounds to address some of these barriers by co-delivering services in the CAoV, these workarounds have not been able to resolve issues of service duplication and inefficiencies. FSIM has commented further on this in its assessment of progress for action 3.9.

If these systemic issues are not addressed, and if agencies do not find another pathway to completing actions that require consultation and agreement with the UFU, there is a risk that actions 3.8, 3.9, 3.12 and 5.1 will not be delivered on time.

Finding three – Joint operational governance has not been effective in progressing interoperability initiatives between CFA and FRV

Establishing the Fire Services Operational Committee (FSOC) was a deliverable under action 3.7. CFA and FRV established FSOC in 2021 to identify and promote collaboration and interoperability opportunities and to strengthen working relations between the two agencies. FSOC has six sub-committees.

FSOC did not progress any work against a formalised workplan in 2023/24. FSIM has been advised that FSOC responded to ad-hoc issues instead. In this reporting period, FSOC and four of its sub-committees did not have a workplan. In addition, FSOC and one of its sub-committees cancelled up to six meetings this financial year due to key personnel not being available to meet. This presented a significant opportunity cost for CFA and FRV, who have important interoperability initiatives to progress, and contribute to, under relevant actions in the implementation plan (e.g. actions 3.8 and 3.9).

FSIM commented on these very same issues in relation to FSOC in its 2022/23 annual report and notes that these issues persisted for most of 2023/24. Towards the end of the reporting period, CFA and FRV heads of agencies (HoA) developed a draft workplan for FSOC’s endorsement and communicated expectations about FSOC meeting regularly in 2024/25 and reporting back to HoA on progress against the agreed workplan every quarter. FSIM will closely monitor FSOC’s quarterly progress updates to HoA and recommends that HoA take early action when FSOC is not delivering on its agreed workplan.

FSIM has also observed that there is some overlap in the responsibilities for joint operational working groups (i.e. FSOC, the Joint Child Safety Working Group and the Joint Secondment Workforce Advisory Group) in relation to ensuring FRV secondees are compliant with the Child Safe Standards (e.g. actions 3.8 and 5.1).

There is a risk that this overlap in responsibilities could result in duplication of effort, inconsistent messaging, reduced accountability and key deliverables not being completed. There is an opportunity for agencies to review these arrangements to streamline operational governance for delivering actions 3.8 and 5.1 to mitigate these risks.

Finding four – There continues to be challenges filling Assistant Chief Fire Offer (ACFO) and Commander vacancies in CFA, on both a permanent and relief basis

In 2023/24, CFA experienced a deficit of, on average, 17 senior operational leaders (i.e. Commanders and ACFOs) each week. This equates to 11 per cent of CFA’s operational workforce. At its worst, CFA experienced a deficit of 33 operational positions (i.e. 20.6 per cent of its operational workforce) for one week in 2023/24.

CFA reports that the vacancies have resulted in impacted CFA districts, groups, brigades and volunteers not receiving the dedicated operational support and leadership they need to ensure operational preparedness and readiness. CFA also reported that the vacancies are impacting on CFA’s ability to maintain operations against its statutory obligations and provide safe systems of work in relation to fatigue management of its seconded workforce.

The challenges filling vacancies and non-relief is a complex, multi-faceted issue that pre-dates the reform and is likely caused by a combination of factors. This includes personnel and organisational culture issues, staff being on medical leave, FRV’s ageing workforce, implementation of the secondment model, and FRV’s enterprise agreement and related corporate policies. FSIM has seen evidence of correspondence from CFA to FRV in 2023/24 raising concerns about the scale of the vacancy and non-relief issues experienced by CFA and acknowledging FRV’s efforts to address these issues.

Since the reform, there have been repeated instances where the interaction between FRV’s enterprise agreement and the secondment agreement has constrained CFA’s ability to effectively manage secondees and for FRV to address vacancy and non-relief of the seconded positions within CFA. FSIM acknowledges that CFA and FRV leadership, including FRV’s secondment management department, have made repeated attempts to address the vacancy and non-relief issues but these efforts have had limited impact due to these barriers.

FSIM may further investigate the matter in 2024/25 to better understand the extent to which these barriers are contributing to the vacancy and relief issues and the effectiveness of agency actions to address the issue.

Recommendation: Strengthen governance oversight and reporting for the outstanding actions

Agencies have established governance arrangements at the strategic and operational levels to support increased joint-agency collaboration and to progress reform activities.

FSIM recommends that agencies maximise the utility of these governance groups by increasing active governance oversight for all outstanding actions. This can be achieved by:

  • FSR SEC providing active oversight of all the remaining actions in the implementation plan, with a priority focus on action 3.8, 3.9, 3.12 and 5.1, as these are at high-risk of not being completed on time.
  • HoA providing active oversight of all the joint governance and working groups that report to it (e.g. FSOC and its sub-committees, the Joint Secondment Workforce Advisory Group and the Joint Child Safety Working Group).
  • FSR SEC and HoA taking clear and decisive action to resolve issues, where there is a risk of an action not being completed on time or in line with the action objectives.

Active governance oversight must be supported by high-level implementation timelines and regular reporting of progress against these timelines. FSIM therefore recommends that to provide increased transparency and reporting of progress, agencies must:

  • document the expected completion dates and key milestones for each of the remaining deliverables in the outstanding implementation plan actions, including issues and risks that are being actively monitored.
  • provide HoA and FSR SEC regular reports of progress against the expected completion dates, with increased frequency of reporting (e.g. monthly) for the actions that are at high-risk of not being completed on time.

Overview of the reform progress to date

A high-level summary of key reform milestones from Years 1 to 4.

Summary

Since the reform commenced in July 2020, CFA and FRV have each made notable progress to deliver relevant implementation plan actions for which they have sole responsibility and have achieved important milestones. Both agencies have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to the reform and are working towards establishing the foundations for a complementary fire service despite the complex challenges encountered in the operational and industrial environments.

The table below provides a high-level summary of key milestones jointly achieved by agencies from Years 1 to 4 of the reform. It is not intended to be a detailed acquittal of the specific actions completed by each agency – this information can be found in Appendix B.

Table 2: Summary of key reform milestones

FSIM Year Four annual report (2023-24) - Table 2: Summary of key reform milestones

Key milestones for Fire Services Reform

Year 1 (2020/21)

  • The Fire Rescue Victoria Act 1958 commenced on 1 July 2020.
  • The FRV Act established FRV as a dedicated career firefighting agency, bringing together the former Metropolitan Fire Brigade and CFA career firefighters.
  • The Act also re-established CFA as a volunteer firefighting agency.
  • The Act established three independent bodies to provide oversight of the reform including the Fire District Review Panel, FSIM, and the FRB.
  • The Minister for Emergency Services released the Year One Fire Services Reform Implementation Plan outlining actions agencies will complete to deliver on the intended outcomes of the reform.
  • CFA and FRV signed transfer statements to transfer relevant property, assets, liabilities, rights and obligations from CFA to FRV to support the delivery of reform (noting two allocation statements are outstanding – action 3.3).
  • Agencies also developed their respective outcomes frameworks and began reporting on results every quarter.

Year 2 (2021/22)

  • The Minister published the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan comprising 41 actions.
  • CFA and FRV developed a governance framework to oversee and support the implementation of key reform activities at strategic and operational levels. Accordingly, agencies established HoA, FSOC and six FSOC sub-committees.
  • CFA and FRV each delivered work to strengthen their respective agencies’ culture and values.
  • Agencies commenced developing performance measures for implementation plan actions, which will guide future effectiveness assessments by FSIM.

Year 3 (2022/23)

  • DJCS established the Fire Services Reform Strategic Executive Committee to address strategic and whole-of-reform issues and opportunities.
  • CFA and FRV developed a workflow approval process that outlines the entire consultation and approval process.
  • CFA and FRV completed work to recognise the contribution made by both volunteer and career firefighters. The agencies collaborated to support nominations for national awards, and CFA expanded the CFA Service Awards to ensure seconded staff can be recognised for their service and contribution to CFA.
  • CFA and FRV each developed strategies and plans to improve inclusion and diversity in their respective agencies.

Year 4 (2023/24)

  • The Minister for Emergency Services approved a change request for all remaining actions in the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan in July 2024 (see Table 1).
  • DJCS established governance to address ongoing financial sustainability for agencies in the emergency management sector, including CFA and FRV.
  • CFA developed a fire services reform dashboard to be used as a shared tool for monitoring progress on all the agreements and guidelines being developed under action 3.9.
  • FRV’s Women’s Support Coordinator program was recognised at the 2024 Emergency Services Foundation’s Diversity and Inclusion Awards, winning the Women’s Equality Initiative award category (action 4.9)

Monitoring 'in progress' actions

Progress on the remaining implementation plan actions as at 30 June 2024.

Monitoring ‘in progress’ actions

Overview

In 2023/24, agencies completed 12 actions and formally acquitted each of these actions. As at 30 June 2024, agencies reported that:

  • 27 actions were completed
  • 7 actions were in progress – on track
  • 6 actions were in progress – minor delays
  • 1 action was in progress – significant delays.

A high-level summary of the status of all the implementation plan actions is at Appendix B.

The below table provides definitions for the agency-reported status of implementation plan actions.

Table 3: Government implementation status definitions

Status

DJCS progress assessment definitions

In progress - on trackAction is on track to be completed by the ‘completion date’ as per the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan.
CompletedAction is finished and formally acquitted through completion and signing of the acquittal form.
In progress - minor delaysAction is experiencing minor delays that may impact delivery by the ‘completion date’ as per the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan.
In progress - significant delaysAction is experiencing significant delays and it is highly unlikely that the ‘completion date’ as per the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan will be met.

Note: The action completion date is the due date for a given action, as per the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan.

FSIM uses the below status descriptions when making an assessment of agencies’ progress to deliver an action.

Table 4: FSIM’s progress assessment definitions

Status

Description

ProgressingFSIM considers the action is in progress. FSIM will continue to monitor and report on its status.
ImplementedFSIM considers the action has been completed in accordance with the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan action scope. FSIM may undertake effectiveness assessments of actions that are implemented.
Partially implementedFSIM considers the action has either not been delivered in accordance with the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan action deliverables or that there are outstanding matters to resolve before FSIM considers the action complete. FSIM may undertake effectiveness assessments of actions that are partially implemented.
ClosedFSIM has evaluated the effectiveness of the implemented action against its intended objectives.

Priorities

Looking forward

This chapter outlines the Fire Services Implementation Monitor’s monitoring and assessment priorities for Year Five.

Year 5 (2024/25) marks the final year of the current Year 2-5 Implementation Plan.

Agencies are expected to have completed all the actions in the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan by June 2025. FSIM notes that while agencies have delivered most of the actions, of the 14 actions that remain, agencies report that 7 are on track and 7 are experiencing delays. FSIM has concerns about the limited progress made on some of these actions and the risk that these actions will not be delivered on time and in line with the action objectives.

In Year 5, FSIM will track agency progress against key milestones for the outstanding actions. FSIM will also monitor actions taken by existing governance and oversight mechanisms to address implementation barriers for the outstanding actions using complementary fire services principles. There will be a focus on actions that carry a high risk of not being completed on time (actions 3.8, 3.9, 3.12 and 5.1). FSIM will do this by reviewing agencies’ quarterly progress updates provided to DJCS, making formal information requests to agencies to enquire about a particular action, and discussing outstanding actions and issues in regular monthly meetings with the agencies.

FSIM will also monitor actions taken by agencies to address the strategic, operational and child safety risks from non-compliance with the Child Safety Standards. FSIM will enquire about the outcome of the planned Consultative Committee meeting in September 2024 and pending the outcome of this meeting, seek FRV’s advice on the steps it will take to ensure all current and future FRV secondees meet CFA’s child safe requirements. This has relevance to actions 3.8, 4.5 and 5.1. FSIM will also examine the effectiveness of actions taken by CFA in 2024/25 to address feedback from the Commission for Children and Young People on CFA’s Action Plan to become fully compliant with the standards.

To support FSIM’s understanding of the effectiveness of agency actions to achieve government’s vision for a modern, interoperable fire service, FSIM may assess:

  • the planned roll-out of the new Crew and Strike Team Leader courses (action 1.4) and the updated GFF training program (action 1.6)
  • CFA’s actions to move towards a new operating model (actions 1.7 and 4.7)
  • the effectiveness and impacts of FRV’s Health Model (action 2.3)
  • collaborative efforts by CFA and FRV to deliver agreed capital works in co-located stations (action 3.4)
  • the implementation of the firefighter registration scheme (action 4.2)
  • the effectiveness of FRV’s actions to demonstrate progress towards supporting the government’s commitment of 400 women career firefighters in FRV (action 4.9)
  • the extent to which FRV’s workforce plan, and related activities, incorporate CFA’s capability requirements (action 5.4).

FSIM looks forward to working with agencies in 2024/25 to support its monitoring and effectiveness assessment activities and thanks them for their ongoing cooperation.

FSIM also looks forward to further advice and direction from government about its fire services reform priorities for Year 6 and beyond.

Appendix A: Glossary of key terms

Glossary of key terms used in the report.

Abbreviated termTitle
ACFOAssistant Chief Fire Officer
BCPABaseline Capability Profiling Application
CAoVCountry Area of Victoria
CFACountry Fire Authority
CSBACommunity Safety Building Authority
DJCSDepartment of Justice and Community Safety
EMVEmergency Management Victoria
FIRSFire Information Reporting System
FRB Firefighters Registration Board
FRVFire Rescue Victoria
FRV ActFire Rescue Victoria Act 1958
FSIMFire Services Implementation Monitor
FSOCFire Services Operational Committee
FSR SECFire Services Reform Strategic Executive Committee
FWCFair Work Commission
GFFGeneral Firefighter
HoACFA/FRV Heads of Agency Steering Committee
IBACIndependent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission
ICTInformation and communications technology
MinisterMinister for Emergency Services
MoUMemorandum of Understanding
MFBMetropolitan Fire Brigade
OHSOccupational Health and Safety
PADPractical Areas for Drills
PPCPersonal protective clothing
RTORegistered Training Organisation
SLDAService Level Deed of Agreement
SWAHSafe Working at Heights
UFUUnited Firefighters Union of Australia – Victoria Branch
VFBVVolunteer Fire Brigades Victoria
VRQAVictorian Registration and Qualifications Authority
VSPVolunteer Support Package
WSCWomen’s Support Coordinator

Appendix B: Summary of action status as at 30 June 2024

The status of implementation plan actions as at 30 June 2024.

Agencies reported that 27 actions were completed and of the remaining 14 actions:

• 7 are in progress - on track
• 6 are in progress - minor delays
• 1 is in progress - significant delays.

Government implementation status definitions

StatusDJCS progress assessment definitions
CompletedAction is finished and formally acquitted through completion and signing of the acquittal form.
In progress - On trackAction is on track to be completed by the ‘completion date’ as per the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan.
In progress - Minor delaysAction is experiencing minor delays that may impact delivery by the ‘completion date’ as per the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan.
In progress - Significant delaysAction is experiencing significant delays and it is highly unlikely that the ‘completion date’ as per the Year 2-5 Implementation Plan will be met.

Status of Year Two to Five Implementation Plan actions as at 30 June 2024

Priority one: Strengthen CFA as a volunteer firefighting agency

RefLead agency and action descriptionAgency reported status Completion date
1.1CFA – Develop CFA’s Engagement Framework. Completed June 2025
1.2CFA – Complete delivery of the Volunteer Recruitment and Retention Program. Completed June 2025
1.3CFA – Deliver the Volunteer Support Package. In progress – minor delays March 2025
1.4CFA – Develop new Crew and Strike Team Leader training courses. In progress – on track December 2024
1.5CFA – Complete delivery of the connected brigades project (part of $3.6 million program to enhance critical volunteer facing ICT systems).
Completed June 2023
1.6CFA – Review and update training as part of the develop Enhancing Training Capacity for New Volunteers.
In progress – minor delays June 2025
1.7CFA – Review CFA’s operating model and develop a roadmap to create a more contemporary and sustainable organisation. Completed June 2025

Priority two: Strengthen FRV as a career firefighting agency

RefLead agency and action descriptionAgency reported status Completion date
2.1FRV – Commence Phase Two of the operational communications rollout, including upgrades to station turn out equipment in FRV stations.CompletedJune 2023
2.2FRV – Explore the operational and service delivery benefits of accreditation for FRV within the Victorian emergency management response model and provide options to government on the accreditation process.CompletedJune 2023
2.3FRV – Develop and implement a contemporary Health Model, which establishes state-wide comprehensive organisational health standards, policies and support mechanisms that are designed to proactively manage and mitigate health risks whilst improving the effectiveness and quality of care provided to our firefighters and corporate staff.CompletedJune 2023
2.4FRV – Merge required legacy enterprise agreements and commence negotiations on new agreements.CompletedNovember 2024

Priority three: Plan and build for the future

RefLead agency and action descriptionAgency reported status Completion date
3.1FRV – Ensure FRV’s Information and Communications Technology (ICT) is consistent across all stations to support service delivery.CompletedJune 2025
3.2CFA – Deliver the fire station and firefighting fleet replacement program.In progress – significant delaysJune 2025
3.3CFA – Finalise the transfer of property, assets, liabilities, rights and obligations from CFA to FRV.In progress – minor delaysDecember 2024
3.4FRV – FRV, in consultation with CFA, identify capital works required across designated stations at the time of the reform and develop a framework (Tenancy Agreement) to support delivery of agreed projects. CompletedJune 2025
3.5CFA – CFA to complete delivery of agreed capital works projects on behalf of FRV.CompletedJune 2023
3.6FRV – Rollout of the FRV Personal Protective Clothing (PPC) ensembles as part of the PPC project.CompletedJune 2023
3.7CFA and FRV – Agencies mature existing joint governance arrangements that support the implementation of the program and ongoing development of interoperability procedures and arrangements.CompletedJune 2023
3.8CFA and FRV – CFA, in collaboration with FRV, to develop protocols to ensure all FRV seconded training staff satisfy CFA’s Registered Training Organisation (RTO) obligations and requirements. In progress – on trackJune 2025
3.9CFA and FRV – Where practical and appropriate, finalise harmonisation of procedures, including service level procedures between CFA and FRV and any related party to ensure the agreements support effective operations. In progress – on trackJune 2025
3.10CFA – Where practical and appropriate, finalise any delegation authorisations between CFA and FRV to support the operationalisation of the Service Level Deeds of Agreement (SLDA) and schedules. CompletedJune 2023
3.11CFA – CFA to ensure internal policies and procedures support the arrangements outlined in the SLDA and schedules.CompletedJune 2024
3.12CFA and FRV – Develop agreements for corporate support functions between CFA and FRV that enable service delivery.In progress – minor delaysJune 2025

Priority four: Valuing our people

RefLead agency and action descriptionAgency reported status Completion date
4.1DJCS – Appoint the Firefighters Registration Board (FRB).CompletedAugust 2023
4.2FRB – The Firefighters Registration Board establishes criteria and processes to support registration of suitably qualified secondees from FRV to CFA. In progress - on track December 2024
4.3CFA – Complete delivery of the volunteer’s health and safety initiatives program; specifically, the wildfire respiratory protection trial, the firefighter safety compliance initiatives and the wildfire PPC project. In progress – minor delays June 2025
4.4

FRV – Define FRV values and culture and deliver supporting programs of work:

  • Develop FRV values
  • Strategy to embed FRV values
  • Leadership development and capability.
CompletedJune 2023
4.5CFA – Define a program of work to strengthen CFA’s organisational culture, diversity and inclusion.CompletedJune 2025
4.6

FRV – Develop the following documents to support inclusion and diversity across FRV:

  • Diversity and Inclusion Framework, Strategy and Action Plan.
  • Gender Equity Action Plan.
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Reconciliation Action Plan.
In progress - on track September 2024
4.7CFA – Develop a scope for leadership roles that reflect contemporary brigade and group models.CompletedFebruary 2025
4.8CFA and FRV – Identify new opportunities to recognise and value the contribution made by both volunteer and career firefighters to delivering fire services (e.g. communications and collaboration). CompletedJune 2023
4.9FRV – Develop a recruitment strategy and campaign to support increased gender diversity across all firefighting ranks. Review the recruitment process, training and promotional pathways to ensure they support the retention of a gender diverse workforce. In progress - on track December 2025
4.10CFA – Support diversity and inclusion in CFA and make progress towards delivering on the commitment to increasing the number of women in brigade leadership roles to 15 per cent.CompletedJune 2025

Priority five: Ensure the future sustainability of fire services

RefLead agency and action descriptionAgency reported status Completion date
5.1CFA and FRV – Capability and capacity requirements of the seconded workforce to deliver an effective CFA are clearly articulated by CFA, and FRV establishes a roadmap to deliver on these requirements in alignment with the legislative obligations of both organisations.In progress – minor delays June 2025
5.2DJCS – DJCS, with input from CFA and FRV, undertake a review of current state service delivery capability and capacity requirements in CFA and FRV and key issues and risks. In progress - on track November 2024
5.3FRV – Develop an FRV Strategy. CompletedSeptember 2022
5.4FRV – Develop a Strategic Workforce Plan for operations with a strong focus on regional and remote delivery of services.CompletedMarch 2023
5.5DJCS – Conduct an initial financial sustainability assessment of FRV and CFA.CompletedDecember 2021
5.6

DJCS – Develop an initial funding plan that addresses high priority funding requirements for CFA and FRV in years three and four of the Fire Services Reform and addresses the impact of:

  • transfers of functions, resources and assets between CFA and FRV
  • the change to the FRV fire district upon the fire services property levy revenue base after the commencing day
  • any changes to the differential rates of the fire services property levy after the commencing day.
CompletedDecember 2021
5.7DJCS – Capture the operational costs incurred to deliver fire services in Victoria based on three years of financial reporting. CompletedDecember 2024
5.8DJCS – CFA and FRV to ensure internal budgets consider the funding estimates over the forward years provided by the Victorian Government.CompletedJune 2025